Page 4 of 7

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:38 pm
by englishangel
No, sorry, still not with you.

and I am not blonde, and I can type english despite my advanced years.

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:43 pm
by Great Plum
Julian can change the number of posts that show on the left hand side - regardless of how many he has actually posted!

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:44 pm
by englishangel
What has that got to do with your extra 9?

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:45 pm
by Great Plum
JR said he had posted 9999 times when in fact it says Julian had posted 99999 times. I said to add an extra 9!

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:46 pm
by englishangel
I see now,

that should be "Julian HAS changed the number of his posts to put him at the top."

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:55 pm
by J.R.
blondie95 wrote:thank you im glad there are two of us who dont get it?
Would you care to re-phrase that sentence, Amy ????????????

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:59 pm
by Great Plum
Ha!!! :lol:

Sorry I confused people!

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:08 am
by englishangel
J.R. wrote:
blondie95 wrote:thank you im glad there are two of us who dont get it?
Would you care to re-phrase that sentence, Amy ????????????
You are disgusting

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:54 pm
by J.R.
englishangel wrote:
J.R. wrote:
blondie95 wrote:thank you im glad there are two of us who dont get it?
Would you care to re-phrase that sentence, Amy ????????????
You are disgusting
I hate to say this Mary, but it's all in your mind !

I only asked Amy a question !

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:15 am
by englishangel
J.R. wrote:
englishangel wrote:
J.R. wrote: Would you care to re-phrase that sentence, Amy ????????????
You are disgusting
I hate to say this Mary, but it's all in your mind !

I only asked Amy a question !
Yes, but there is no need for Amy to rephrase what is not a question but a statement, she only needs to remove the question mark.

However at least she has only put a single question mark where it is not needed.

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 9:53 pm
by blondie95
thank you Mary-surely J.R you know by now my posts are never grammatically correct or mis-spelt and generally mean something totally different to what I mean! ;)

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:06 am
by DavebytheSea
blondie95 wrote:thank you Mary-surely J.R you know by now my posts are never grammatically correct or mis-spelt and generally mean something totally different to what I mean! ;)
I know you would never tell a lie, Amy, but don't we think that is stretching the truth just a little?

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:20 am
by blondie95
why, they generally are not correct in many ways!

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:19 am
by englishangel
yes but you have said they are NOT mis-spelt and then said they don't mean what you mean rather than don't mean what you write!!

I think!!

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:36 am
by DavebytheSea
No wonder we are all getting a little confused!

Amy says that she doesn't mis-spell in her posts. She then goes on to say that she doesn't mean what she means, in which case perhaps she means that she agrees that she does mis-spell. However, that still leaves grave doubt about what she does actually mean when she says that her posts are not always grammatically correct, which, indeed, they are not (always grammatically correct).

(Perhaps it is foolish to seek to find any logic in the scribblings of a blonde - especially one as lovely as she. Maybe all we should look for is to be entertained by her - which indeed we are. Thank you, Amy.).