Re: Oh dear..here we go again.
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:13 pm
Should not someone, preferably from the school, have corrected the mistaken impression given that fees are all £30,000 per annum ?
Welcome to the unofficial Christ's Hospital Forum - for discussing everything CH/Old Blue related. All pupils, parents, families, staff, Old Blues and anyone else related to CH are welcome to browse the boards, register and contribute.
https://www.chforum.info/php/
Sadly, that's not remotely newsworthy. The HM foolishly wading in with an unnecessary rebuttal, is more so. Who does PR for CH? They need a kicking.Kit Bartlett wrote:Should not someone, preferably from the school, have corrected the mistaken impression given that fees are all £30,000 per annum ?
I fear there is a lot of truth in that, David!Foureyes wrote: Thirdly, it seems to be assumed that those now running C.H. would not like the school to be known as 'a leading boarding school with £30,000 fees.' Perhaps, that is exactly what they do want and the charitable element is an embarrassment for them? I am not saying that is the case, but it does seem sometimes that it is!
I agree! I'm afraid that for all the puff, CH leadership are intent on moving from the founding credo.Katharine wrote:I fear there is a lot of truth in that, David!Foureyes wrote: Thirdly, it seems to be assumed that those now running C.H. would not like the school to be known as 'a leading boarding school with £30,000 fees.' Perhaps, that is exactly what they do want and the charitable element is an embarrassment for them? I am not saying that is the case, but it does seem sometimes that it is!
A good question, Christopher. However, 'The School' do not tend to answer querstions on this site.Kit Bartlett wrote:Should not someone, preferably from the school, have corrected the mistaken impression given that fees are all £30,000 per annum ?
I think that he was suggesting that the fifth estate be made aware - we already knowJ.R. wrote:A good question, Christopher. However, 'The School' do not tend to answer querstions on this site.Kit Bartlett wrote:Should not someone, preferably from the school, have corrected the mistaken impression given that fees are all £30,000 per annum ?
The campaign against FF was saying that the intake this September last was about 22%?Kit Bartlett wrote:As a matter of interest is there a published figure anywhere of how many pupils' parents are in fact paying the full £30,000 per annum fees ?