Old Blue Scientists???

Post requests for information about people you've lost touch with, and would like to contact again.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
2nd Former
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:17 pm
Real Name: Diana Garnham
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Old Blue Scientists???

Post by dg64 » Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:24 pm

Hi everyone. I am just re-connecting with the Forum. I am doing the responder slot for the Founders Day dinner this year (Jonathan Osborne doing the main bit) and we are supposed to be talking about the science traditions of the school. Anyone know Old Blues who became scientists and especially any girls from Hertford. The scientists seem to be fairly thin on the ground. Would also welcome any thoughts or perspectives from anyone who recalls science at Hertford, good or bad........

Button Grecian
Posts: 3002
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 10:44 pm
Real Name: Katharine Dobson
Location: Gwynedd
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Old Blue Scientists???

Post by Katharine » Thu Aug 15, 2013 11:27 am

Judy Evans, seems to be trotted out as a senior plastic surgeon. Do you include mathematicians? Dame Ida Busbridge was the first Woman President of the Mathematical Association, I believe. She spent much of her life at St Hugh's College, Oxford, and was there when I was at LMH. She wanted to know why I hadn't applied to her college, but I wanted to get in on my own merit and not because of CH connections!

The Science school at Hertford was very early for girls to have such facilities, and I think we were lucky to have specialist teachers for each of the three main sciences. I wonder when that started?
Katharine Dobson (Hills) 6.14, 1959 - 1965
Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia!

User avatar
Deputy Grecian
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 4:17 pm
Real Name: Mike Adams
Location: New England
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Old Blue Scientists??? we

Post by LongGone » Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:47 pm

Well, I wasn't at Hertford, but I am a Geneticist (so I guess that counts for one part). Given the high quality of science teaching at CH, I have already raved about Dick Fry in the past, I have always been surprised how few of my generation went on to graduate school. In part this may be that there was a pervasive attitude that only Classics and History were *real* subjects worthy of scholars, the sciences were for unwashed oiks. As an aside, I have found that almost all of my colleagues are well-grounded in the Arts and Social sciences, while almost all of my 'arty' friends are totally ignorant of all of the sciences (and are proud of it).
If a stone falls on an egg: alas for the egg
If an egg falls on a stone: alas for the egg

Button Grecian
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Real Name: David Charles Rawlins
Location: Somerset
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Old Blue Scientists???

Post by DavidRawlins » Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:06 pm

Michael Seakins PA1945-54 was a scientist. When I last heard of him he was living in Barbados. He did researh in physical chemistry, and was senior lecturer in Univesity of West Indies.
He was scathing about some of my results in medical research; he had not appreciated the wide variability of biological data.
He was also involved in the local coastguard service, and possibly navy.
His son was in PA 79-85.
Col A 1946-1953

2nd Former
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:08 pm
Real Name: Phyllis Hoffman
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Old Blue Scientists???

Post by phyllis » Tue Aug 20, 2013 5:43 pm

I believe that the chemistry lab at Hertford went to the Science museum when the girls moved to Horsham. We were always told this was because of its importance as the first Science lab for girls in the UK. I don't believe it has ever been on display but is/was located in the basement at the mueum.

Chris T
3rd Former
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:42 pm
Real Name: Chris Tanner
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Old Blue Scientists???

Post by Chris T » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:11 pm

Although this is late, I hope that it will be of some use.

Jonathan Osborne will almost certainly speak on the heuristic method and CH. But he may not mention how the heuristic method came about, with its origins in the second half of the 19th century.

Prof HE Armstrong had Chas E Browne as an acolyte and (since Armstrong was a Governor of CH, appointed by the Royal Society) HEA ensured that CEB was appointed to head CH Science in 1899. In CH at Newgate Street he taught science in a disused dormitory. HEA was instrumental in designing the first scientific labs at CH Horsham. This was unique in public schools for some years and CH was much visited in the first decade of the 20th century by teachers from other public schools. The heuristic method was developed by CEB, with influence from HEA. Then G Van Praagh, carried it further in chemistry. Osborne will probably mention this. But he may not recount the next para.

All this came about because HEA had spent time studying chemistry in Germany. In 1867 he attended the Paris International Exhibition. He realised from both experiences that the technical education in Germany and France far surpassed that of the UK, for Germany had its trade schools and technical high schools and France its Grandes Ecoles. The UK had no equivalent, for most science was then a gentlemanly occupation. Hence HEA set up an establishment to teach teachers of science. CEB was a pupil there and then a demonstrator. In 1856 WH Perkin (a British chemist) had discovered the first aniline dye (mauveine) and because of industrial adaptations by Germans, a large and profitable German industry was established, and the UK users of their industrial dyes had to pay very large royalties to use a British invention.* So because the UK had an extensive textile industry the drawbacks of UK’s lack of technical education were quickly realised and this was rubbed in by the Paris Exhibition. HEA resolved to do something about this. Hence the rest of the story, involving CEB and CH, with economic influences that few appreciate.

* By coincidence a similar thing happened with penicillin (which has no direct CH connection to my knowledge). It was discovered in the UK (resulting in Nobel prizes for Fleming, Florey and Chain), but Florey would not permit it to be patented. (“we must not restrict application of its benefits to mankind ...... “). A US company established a method to allow industrial scale production and so all UK users had to pay large royalties for the final product. The original lab method was totally unsuitable for large scale production. So much for certain idealists.

Two useful refs
1. ‘Education and the Economy. 1870-1939’ by M Sanderson. Recent Findings of Res in Economic & Social Hist, 17, 1993, 1-4.
2. When Science & Poetry were Friends”, Freeman Dyson, NY Review of books, Aug13, vol 56, no 13, pp 15-18. (This is a review of “The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science”: Richard Holmes, Pantheon, NY, 2008.)

Post Reply