WATER TOWER

Anything that doesn't fit anywhere else, but that's still CH related.

Moderator: Moderators

Foureyes
Grecian
Posts: 926
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:26 am
Real Name: David
Location: England

WATER TOWER

Post by Foureyes »

Does anyone know the height of the water tower?
This question was posed once before, but while it generated many remarks and reminiscences, not one answered the question!
So, to be specific, what is the height of the water tower (answers in feet or metres, don't mind which)?
David :shock:
brian walling
LE (Little Erasmus)
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 9:32 pm
Real Name: Brian Walling
Location: Penang, Malaysia

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by brian walling »

In my day it was clearly known as being 120 feet high. In a Maths class with I R McConnell we once did some trig exercises and surveyed the tower with some rudimentary surveyor's tools, so I remember the 'official' height clearly. Not sure whether the quoted height of 120 feet was to the peak of the roof or to the top of the flagpole.
Ma A 53-60
User avatar
LongGone
Deputy Grecian
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 4:17 pm
Real Name: Mike Adams
Location: New England

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by LongGone »

brian walling wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:58 am In my day it was clearly known as being 120 feet high. In a Maths class with I R McConnell we once did some trig exercises and surveyed the tower with some rudimentary surveyor's tools, so I remember the 'official' height clearly. Not sure whether the quoted height of 120 feet was to the peak of the roof or to the top of the flagpole.
That was my precise recollection also. I remember the entire class measuring the angle to the top from points in the Quad. Presumably we were told the horizontal distance so we could calculate the height.
If a stone falls on an egg: alas for the egg
If an egg falls on a stone: alas for the egg
Foureyes
Grecian
Posts: 926
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:26 am
Real Name: David
Location: England

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by Foureyes »

Thank you both. That is really useful for some research I am conducting.
David :shock:
brian walling
LE (Little Erasmus)
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 9:32 pm
Real Name: Brian Walling
Location: Penang, Malaysia

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by brian walling »

An interesting ‘aside’ from the underlying topic:

Quite coincidentally, the CH Water Tower and its height were fresh in my mind yesterday when I answered the original post. My wife’s family in UK has ancestral links to a small town in central Germany and just the day before yesterday we unearthed a new fact about the German family in the 1800s. They held the position of town watchman and resided in a small house built on top of the town’s fortified medieval church tower. The tower is listed as being 36 metres or 120 feet high. This immediately struck me as being exactly the height of CH’s tower. Imagine living that high up (300+steps) and even being born up there, as the children were, including the one who subsequently emigrated to England. The ‘live-in’ arrangement ended in the 1840s, but the tower-house survived and you can now have your wedding up there if you want something unusual.
Ma A 53-60
User avatar
LongGone
Deputy Grecian
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 4:17 pm
Real Name: Mike Adams
Location: New England

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by LongGone »

LongGone wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2020 7:28 pm
brian walling wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:58 am In my day it was clearly known as being 120 feet high. In a Maths class with I R McConnell we once did some trig exercises and surveyed the tower with some rudimentary surveyor's tools, so I remember the 'official' height clearly. Not sure whether the quoted height of 120 feet was to the peak of the roof or to the top of the flagpole.
That was my precise recollection also. I remember the entire class measuring the angle to the top from points in the Quad. Presumably we were told the horizontal distance so we could calculate the height.
In an unusual flash of memory, I believe we didn't need to know how far we were from the tower. An initial location is noted when the angle is 45o and a peg is placed. Since tan45 =1, we are now the tower's height away from it. We then moved directly away until the angle is ~27o, at which point the tangent is 0.5 and we are now twice the height away. Measure from here to the peg and multiply by two. QED
If a stone falls on an egg: alas for the egg
If an egg falls on a stone: alas for the egg
William
3rd Former
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 9:59 pm
Real Name: William Devons

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by William »

LongGone is totally correct. But what if you could not approach close enough to the tower to find that it subtended the angle 45 (or 27) degrees? Any two angles will do, not only 45 and 27 degrees, say A & B. Measure one (it’s A). Then walk a measured distance y directly away from the tower. Then remeasure the angle to the top of the tower. It’s now B. The height is H, so

H = y.TanA.TanB / (TanA – TanB) You know A, B, and y, so Bob's your uncle and QED.

I’ll leave it to a genius to prove I’m right (or wrong). And I’ll leave it to a greater genius to decide if the tower’s height can be measured, using this method, if the ground slopes away from its base, for miles and miles and miles (and if so how). Enjoy.
loringa
Deputy Grecian
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:01 pm
Real Name: Andrew Loring
Location: South Gloucestershire

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by loringa »

William wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 5:01 am LongGone is totally correct. But what if you could not approach close enough to the tower to find that it subtended the angle 45 (or 27) degrees? Any two angles will do, not only 45 and 27 degrees, say A & B. Measure one (it’s A). Then walk a measured distance y directly away from the tower. Then remeasure the angle to the top of the tower. It’s now B. The height is H, so

H = y.TanA.TanB / (TanA – TanB) You know A, B, and y, so Bob's your uncle and QED.

I’ll leave it to a genius to prove I’m right (or wrong). And I’ll leave it to a greater genius to decide if the tower’s height can be measured, using this method, if the ground slopes away from its base, for miles and miles and miles (and if so how). Enjoy.
Good point and only one thing: I make the calculation H = y.Tan A.Tan B / (Tan B - Tan A)

If Angle A is less than Angle B (which it is in this case) then Tan A - Tan B will be negative in which case H will be negative. OTOH I am not a genius, not even much of a mathematician, so I could easily have made a mistake but I did enjoy trying to prove (confirm?) your supposition.

QED or, as Bob Rae would have said, Quite Easily Done. As an aside, when I did my teacher training just a few years ago, I was advised that we didn't use QED any more but no-one could tell me why. Perhaps they thought it was elitist as most schools don't offer Latin nowadays but they could hardly object to Bob's explanation.
Katharine
Button Grecian
Posts: 3285
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 10:44 pm
Real Name: Katharine Dobson
Location: Gwynedd

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by Katharine »

In days long gone by, I used to set such example for classes, now I have to THINK about it!

I thought A was nearer the tower, so the angle bigger there, which makes gives h = (ytanA.tanB)/(tanA -tanB) the problem changes if the land isn’t level.
Katharine Dobson (Hills) 6.14, 1959 - 1965
loringa
Deputy Grecian
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:01 pm
Real Name: Andrew Loring
Location: South Gloucestershire

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by loringa »

Katharine wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:33 am I thought A was nearer the tower, so the angle bigger there, which makes gives h = (ytanA.tanB)/(tanA -tanB) the problem changes if the land isn’t level.
Yes indeed - read the b****y question Andrew! Thanks Katharine - I'd better not tell my dd who is now not about to sit her GCSE in maths and further maths but is moving on to the A Level with me coaching her from 3000 miles away!
User avatar
J.R.
Forum Moderator
Posts: 15835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:53 pm
Real Name: John Rutley
Location: Dorking, Surrey

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by J.R. »

I never really did like maths !
John Rutley. Prep B & Coleridge B. 1958-1963.
Katharine
Button Grecian
Posts: 3285
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 10:44 pm
Real Name: Katharine Dobson
Location: Gwynedd

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by Katharine »

J.R. wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:59 am I never really did like maths !
It would have been different had I taught you, John!!! I loved the challenges!
Katharine Dobson (Hills) 6.14, 1959 - 1965
User avatar
jhopgood
Button Grecian
Posts: 1884
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 6:26 pm
Real Name: John Hopgood
Location: Benimeli, Alicante

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by jhopgood »

How did you know the location of the base of the tower?
Barnes B 25 (59 - 66)
AMP
Deputy Grecian
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:15 pm
Real Name: Amp

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by AMP »

brian walling wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 2:12 am An interesting ‘aside’ from the underlying topic:

Quite coincidentally, the CH Water Tower and its height were fresh in my mind yesterday when I answered the original post. My wife’s family in UK has ancestral links to a small town in central Germany and just the day before yesterday we unearthed a new fact about the German family in the 1800s. They held the position of town watchman and resided in a small house built on top of the town’s fortified medieval church tower. The tower is listed as being 36 metres or 120 feet high. This immediately struck me as being exactly the height of CH’s tower. Imagine living that high up (300+steps) and even being born up there, as the children were, including the one who subsequently emigrated to England. The ‘live-in’ arrangement ended in the 1840s, but the tower-house survived and you can now have your wedding up there if you want something unusual.
I would be interested to know the name of that place - worth a visit if I am ever in the vicinity
User avatar
Great Plum
Button Grecian
Posts: 5282
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:59 am
Real Name: Matt Holdsworth
Location: Reigate

Re: WATER TOWER

Post by Great Plum »

Is it not something like 6 feet lower than Sharpenhurst to balance the water from the reservoir there?
Maine B - 1992-95 Maine A 1995-99
Post Reply