Re: What is CH for these days?
Posted: Sun May 24, 2020 8:23 pm
A cultural exchange? We sent pupils to Australia. They sent us Dame Edna.
Welcome to the unofficial Christ's Hospital Forum - for discussing everything CH/Old Blue related. All pupils, parents, families, staff, Old Blues and anyone else related to CH are welcome to browse the boards, register and contribute.
https://www.chforum.info/php/
I was primarily thinking of pre entry, but you make a good point.sejintenej wrote: ↑Sun May 24, 2020 4:07 pmone slight element to the above; the fee is based on your income for the individual year. When i was there it was clear that if (for example) your widowed mother married a rich man or got a well paid new job you would not be expected to leave but the contribution would rise accordingly.
My father used to joke that he made a profit by sending me to CH. At least, I think he was joking...AMP wrote: ↑Sun May 24, 2020 9:22 pmI was primarily thinking of pre entry, but you make a good point.sejintenej wrote: ↑Sun May 24, 2020 4:07 pmone slight element to the above; the fee is based on your income for the individual year. When i was there it was clear that if (for example) your widowed mother married a rich man or got a well paid new job you would not be expected to leave but the contribution would rise accordingly.
Likewise, if a single mother went back to work when the child(ren) was a bit older, the school didn't clobber her with fees immediately. There was usually a year's grace and then a very reasonable contribution asked from someone on a modest income.
I am not against all school trips in principle but they have to be both inclusive so every pupil has a chance to go whilst, at the same time, not being a cost on the institution if it is not one that said institution can afford without any sort of downstream effect.Pe.A wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 12:55 pmWould your criticism include all school trips? What exactly was this 14 day 'jolly' for...?loringa wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 11:19 amI couldn't agree more: a classic example of the 'best being the enemy of the good'. Christ's Hospital has great facilities but it really shouldn't be competing with fee-paying institutions; it is, quite frankly, not what the place is for. A 14-day jolly to Australia for 77 individuals must have been fun but there wouldn't have been much change from £0.25M, enough to fund a pupil though Christ's Hospital for the full 7 years from Year 7 to Year 13!Foureyes wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 10:58 am I shall not go over the now well-known arguments against this except to remark that it often seems to me that all the building and expansion of facilities is more to satisfy management/masters amour propre than for the benefit of children. One very, very expensive undertaking that upset me greatly was a Summer Holiday 'outing' of 14 days duration to Australia for 70-odd pupils and seven staff in (about) 2012-2013. I know that the Head Master at the time was an Australian by birth (but has now seen the light and settled in Sussex) but even so!!
Perfect for future trade negotiations... : /rockfreak wrote: ↑Mon May 25, 2020 7:36 pm Foureyes invites a debate as to why the international megarich would want to send their children to this country what with Coronavirus, etc. I would submit that the answer is heritage and tradition. The universality of the English language, our well-publicised but now defunct empire, our traditions (well known through our film industry (Passage To India et al), Brideshead, Downton, Hugh Grant......Foreigners from the East seem to be bedazzled by our past.
So what does the existence of independent schools got to do with homelessness/food banks etc etc...?rockfreak wrote: ↑Mon May 25, 2020 7:36 pm Foureyes invites a debate as to why the international megarich would want to send their children to this country what with Coronavirus, etc. I would submit that the answer is heritage and tradition. The universality of the English language, our well-publicised but now defunct empire, our traditions (well known through our film industry (Passage To India et al), Brideshead, Downton, Hugh Grant......Foreigners from the East seem to be bedazzled by our past. Less so foreigners from developed Western Europe who generally seem to have their own perfectly good traditions, including schooling their children to a decent standard.
The reason I kick up so much about this country is because I truly believe that tradition and heritage have long been used to anaesthetise us to the malign effects of what is happening to us in the here and now. The sixth richest country in the world but with homelessness and food banks endemic. Large numbers of households claiming that they are just one paycheck away from the street. Every time there's an Olympics, Royal Wedding, Royal Jubilee, people crow: "Oh look, don't we still do these things well!" Yes, I sometimes think they're about the only thing we do well, considering our monumental trade gap ("let others run our companies and grow our food," said Thatcher and Lawson in the late 1980s). We are reliant on the kindness of strangers, particularly Chinese investment capital. But what happens if we have a stand-off with China over Hong Kong - which we should do if we had a halfway ballsy Prime Minister (or one who even appeared to be awake) Tradition is fine in its place but its place is not at the centre of things. Useful tradition, yes; but not sentiment which merely holds up progress.
The answer, of course, is nothing; the far left, however, love to conflate the relative privilege / wealth of one part of society with the relative poverty / disadvantage of another part. For them, it is a zero-sum game.
Quite often the megarich come from areas where the rule of law is not even as firmly established as it is in the UK, I believe that in Imperial China, there was a saying that '...if the winds of Heaven change...' meaning that you could be killed and/or robbed of all your wealth at any time by a change in political fortunes. This was also common in Iberian historically, the Holy Office in Spain, aka the Inquisition, was a 'self-financing regulatory agency' that got to keep the booty from its victims' estates (whereas in the USA today there are lots of asset forfeiture laws which are much milder). Anyway, however rich you are in some countries, if you don't stay on the right side of the winds of Heaven, you may find yourself in prison or poverty in short order. So much easier to bear the tension if your children are in the UK, can speak English, have a guardian and perhaps a fund of sorts to keep them safe, even if you can't get out or your money is gone.rockfreak wrote: ↑Mon May 25, 2020 7:36 pm Foureyes invites a debate as to why the international megarich would want to send their children to this country what with Coronavirus, etc. I would submit that the answer is heritage and tradition. The universality of the English language, our well-publicised but now defunct empire, our traditions (well known through our film industry (Passage To India et al), Brideshead, Downton, Hugh Grant......Foreigners from the East seem to be bedazzled by our past. Less so foreigners from developed Western Europe who generally seem to have their own perfectly good traditions, including schooling their children to a decent standard.
Thank you, son. You are correct. Monumental amounts of fund-raising for the following :94 to Australia, 97 to South Africa, 00 to Barbados (co-ed), 05 to South Africa, 08 to Barbados and 09 to Australia (co-ed).Great Plum wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 10:37 pm I would expect that the trip to Australia was a sports trip (rugby?) - the school have done a number of international sports trips over the years and my memory is that the children going fundraised for nearly all of it...
Pe.A wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 1:46 amSo what does the existence of independent schools got to do with homelessness/food banks etc etc...?rockfreak wrote: ↑Mon May 25, 2020 7:36 pm Foureyes invites a debate as to why the international megarich would want to send their children to this country what with Coronavirus, etc. I would submit that the answer is heritage and tradition. The universality of the English language, our well-publicised but now defunct empire, our traditions (well known through our film industry (Passage To India et al), Brideshead, Downton, Hugh Grant......Foreigners from the East seem to be bedazzled by our past. Less so foreigners from developed Western Europe who generally seem to have their own perfectly good traditions, including schooling their children to a decent standard.
The reason I kick up so much about this country is because I truly believe that tradition and heritage have long been used to anaesthetise us to the malign effects of what is happening to us in the here and now. The sixth richest country in the world but with homelessness and food banks endemic. Large numbers of households claiming that they are just one paycheck away from the street. Every time there's an Olympics, Royal Wedding, Royal Jubilee, people crow: "Oh look, don't we still do these things well!" Yes, I sometimes think they're about the only thing we do well, considering our monumental trade gap ("let others run our companies and grow our food," said Thatcher and Lawson in the late 1980s). We are reliant on the kindness of strangers, particularly Chinese investment capital. But what happens if we have a stand-off with China over Hong Kong - which we should do if we had a halfway ballsy Prime Minister (or one who even appeared to be awake) Tradition is fine in its place but its place is not at the centre of things. Useful tradition, yes; but not sentiment which merely holds up progress.
Having worked in several far-flung nations I would put the reason down to honesty, respect, responsibility, common decency and perhaps going beyond the expected, all of which freaky detests and of which he demands the abolition.
Pe.A posed a question; you not only failed to answer it but, as you invariably do, you went on the attack. Please would you explain the direct, causal link between the relative privilege of one group and the poverty of another. You clearly think it is a zero-sum game but it really isn't. My advantages don't have to lead to others being disadvantaged; indeed, I may be in a better position myself to help those less well off than me.