No Mary, it was my post that was r & penglishangel wrote: now my post just looks ridiculous and pathetic,

Moderator: Moderators
No Mary, it was my post that was r & penglishangel wrote: now my post just looks ridiculous and pathetic,
One tended to be written off early, despite having been bright, optimistic and keen before arriving at Hertford, if one didn't fit the DR profile.Angela Woodford wrote:"Hierarchies and heartache" seems a good thread in which to remember DR.
One encouraging written remark from her ("This is better") in seven years. It wasn't much.
DR's parting words to my parents, so my mother told me, were "You'll always have trouble with Ann". Maybe they did; she certainly gave them ammunition whenever I looked like stepping out of line!Angela Woodford wrote: I can think of many girls who came to CH full of confidence and happiness. They'd done well in the 11+ and they and their parents believed that CH was going to be the very best thing for them. They were let down badly.
I feel intense sympathy for all those other written-off girls. If only I could go back and do it differently!
I've had a lovely day - fantastic weather, unexpectedly ran into a friend at The Farmer's Market, the rope burns on my finger tips have stopped hurting, and it's a long weekend,anniexf wrote: It wasn't until I read Paula's book, and then found this Forum, that I began to realise that I might not be the complete pariah I'd been labelled as. After 50 years of endogenous depression, salvation!
NEILL THE NOTORIOUS wrote:Thank you Ladies -----
I am now a little wiser, now that I know who DR was.
Am I also to assume that SWMNBN is "She who must not be named " -- or is this another Hertford Secret ?
SWSNBN Neill, but you were almost correct: She Who SHALL Not Be Named.
xxx