Page 5 of 32
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:39 pm
by gma
and tissues!!!!!
Oh yuk!
Just received a voicemail message from a local carpet company telling me that the carpet I ordered, (for which I have already paid together with the delivery charge, underlay and fitting), had arrived in store and with a request for the following: "Can you call us and leddus know cos we wanna know if you still wanit fit'ed".
Firstly, I can indeed call, the question is - will I? Secondly, (and also lastly for the pedants amongst us), what do they think I'm going to do with it if I don't have it "fit'ed", roll it out across the lawn myself for the slugs to share with me?

Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:57 pm
by Richard Ruck
From the CHA website:
"Correction to the Christ's Hospital Roll of Honour Old Blue article
The Old Blue, September 2008. Please note the following corrections:
1. Page 32. Caption to upper picture reads“Bishop of Westminster†and should be “Bishop of Worcester.â€
2. Page 32. Lower left picture. The last word of the caption should be “CEMETERY†and not “Cemetry.â€
3. Page 33. Final Paragraph. Penultimate sentence after “live†should read “with and tendâ€.
We apologise for any inconvienance caused by this error."
Ahem, 'these errors', shurely?
No inconvenience caused!
Richard
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:59 pm
by J.R.
EXACTLY, and don't call me 'Shirley' !
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:08 pm
by matthew
Richard Ruck wrote:
Ahem, 'these errors', shurely?
Unless the error in question was failure to proof-read.
I'm not sure whether proof-reading would have caught all that, though. My
Old Blue arrived yesterday, but I've not had a chance to look at it yet.
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:18 pm
by marty
I've also noticed incorrect use of the word 'obviously'. It was a particular favourite of my gran who frequently inserted it into sentences when recounting a story. The problem was that at no point was any of it obvious at all.
I also can't stand the ubiquitous 'innit' at the end of every sentence, regardless of grammar or the sentence not even being a question: "I'm gonna watch the football, innit."

No, no, no!
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:21 pm
by J.R.
marty wrote:I've also noticed incorrect use of the word 'obviously'. It was a particular favourite of my gran who frequently inserted it into sentences when recounting a story. The problem was that at no point was any of it obvious at all.
I also can't stand the ubiquitous 'innit' at the end of every sentence, regardless of grammar or the sentence not even being a question:
"I'm gonna watch the football, innit." 
No, no, no!
I'm afraid thats an innovation of my Grand-Childrens generation, though happilly ours don't use it.
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:28 pm
by marty
Showing your age there JR!
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:32 pm
by J.R.
marty wrote:Showing your age there JR!
....... and proud of it !
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:21 pm
by midget
Well done that man all 6ft 2ins of him (whatever, and I hate that too)
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:25 am
by englishangel
Please could I just point out (naming no names) that the word is INCIDENTALLY not INCIDENTLY
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:01 pm
by Angela Woodford
May I fume just a little at this time of year as the words "fair" and "fare" is replaced by "fayre"!
I can't bear it - I just can't!
Gerrie - I have encountered people who have fitted their own carpets - how I admire them! What a skill.
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:57 pm
by midget
Angela Woodford wrote:May I fume just a little at this time of year as the words "fair" and "fare" is replaced by "fayre"!
I can't bear it - I just can't!
.
I agree. Why do they do it?
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:53 pm
by Jo
And speaking of fayres, since this thread is about pedantry: people will insist on talking about "Ye Olde Fayre" or some such, and pronouncing "Ye" with an initial Y. Whereas in fact "Y" for a while in middle English replaced the old English character "thorn", which represented the "th" sound. So it was never pronounced "Ye", but "The".
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 5:29 pm
by NEILL THE NOTORIOUS
Hurrah ! for Pedants, of which I am proud to be one.
Apropos, "Names" : When I was admitted to Munchen Gladbach Military Hospital in 1956, we had to give our Rank and Names to the Clerk, in Reception----- Rank was obvoius -- being in Uniform, Evans , Neill Purdie ---- off to sit down.
The next "Candidate" was a Major ---- Name ? Moncrieff, Christian names ? "I don't use my Christian Names "
The Clerk : " i'm sorry Sir, I MUST have your Christian names " This exchange is repeated twice.
The Major "Right !" --- he then proceeds to give about TEN Christian Names, which has the Clerk scribbling down the margins of the form.
I, having sussed the situation, asked," You are Lord Moncrieff , are you the Moncrieff of Moncrieff ? "
He replied "No I am only a minor Moncrieff, and I am in the Army, because I have a crumbling Castle and an Estate that just runs itself ! I shouldn't have done that ---- but I can never resist Officialdom !"
I liked this man !
Re: The Pedant's Revolt
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 5:37 pm
by NEILL THE NOTORIOUS
Another Post ---
Does anyone , as myself, collect stupid notices ? a few of my favourites are : Cattle please close gate-- Farm Crossing--
This door is alarmed (The next one is TERRIFIED !) and the best, so far, (On a Bin) Dog Waste , courtesy of the Friends of Upton House.
We might start a new Topic on "Notices " !