Diversion! (Health Warning! Full of smutty inuendo etc)

DavebytheSea · Post by **DavebytheSea** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:01 pm

.... and I pride myself on my spelling!

..... but, Miss Tyrrell, I shall now examine all of yours for the minutest little blemish!

DavebytheSea · Post by **DavebytheSea** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:03 pm

Ruthie-Baby wrote: beginning to feel a bit better thanks though they still nearly meet in the middle

Ruthie-Baby(old a/c) · Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:10 pm

DavebytheSea wrote:.... and I pride myself on my spelling! ..... but, Miss Tyrrell, I shall now examine all of yours for the minutest little blemish!

I wasn't calling you guilty for incorrect spelling, I was calling you guilty for starting two threads with identical names which as you know how lost I get you MUST have done just to confuse me....!

DavebytheSea · Post by **DavebytheSea** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:29 pm

No - it was not entirely for that purpose, Ruth (although knowing your penchant for getting lost, I might have pointed you in that direction). You see, there remains some vestigial logic in my brain which demands that for every section of the Forum where people digress in such a manner as to offend those of a more sensitive nature, there is a requirement for an area which shall remain unvisited by them. If it affords a happy space for you to get lost in, then so much the better.

Ruthie-Baby(old a/c) · Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:48 pm

I like your logic.

But.

When I click on 'Profile' at the top of the page, it gives me a list of all my recently visited topics and shows me which ones have unread posts. However, only if the topic name is really short does it tell me which section of the forum (e.g. non-CH) it's in. And the names of the Diversion topics are too long, so I can have no idea what section they're in. Therefore I can't be expected to know which one I should or someone else has divert(ed) to.

Pants I lost control of the grammar towards the end but I hope you get what I mean.

Ruthie-Baby(old a/c) · Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:49 pm

that's utter b*ll*cks sorry.

ignore it completely.

DavebytheSea · Post by **DavebytheSea** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:55 pm

lol - you are my sort of girl!

Ruthie-Baby(old a/c) · Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:57 pm

first time I wrote the bad word out in full as I was sure I'd get stars... but there weren't any! so I had to go back and put them in!!!

Richard Ruck · Post by **Richard Ruck** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:00 pm

Ruthie-Baby wrote:first time I wrote the bad word out in full as I was sure I'd get stars... but there weren't any! so I had to go back and put them in!!!

It's probably American software - it might not recognise the word!

DavebytheSea · Post by **DavebytheSea** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:00 pm

You could try putting progressively ruder words in and see when it draws the line?? But you what water you are drinking at the time!

Ruthie-Baby(old a/c) · Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:02 pm

DavebytheSea wrote:... But you what water you are drinking at the time!

what?

Mrs C. · Post by **Mrs C.** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:05 pm

something to do with what water I think !!

DavebytheSea · Post by **DavebytheSea** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:05 pm

Sorry some errors there - both in omission and of event. Last time I wrote What water - the censor object on the grounds of ****.

Mrs C. · Post by **Mrs C.** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:05 pm

see - it censored it this time! is it cos DBTS is green that he doesn`t get censored??

DavebytheSea · Post by **DavebytheSea** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:06 pm

ah! it didn't much like that, Ruth!