Unofficial Christ's Hospital Forum

Is it a right? Discuss.

http://www.abd.org.uk/index.htm

In what context, Mid A 15 ??

J.R. wrote:In what context, Mid A 15 ??

A literal context. Should people have the right to move around as they please or do governments have a duty to create as much hassle as possible?

Whilst I believe in 'Freedom of Movement' generally, I feel there must be some form of control over certain people who should be 'watched' very closely.

Does this answer your question ??

The government's proposed linink of traffic/security cameras:
Dodgy. Would have to be very restricted access, and not sure about them including private cctv systems [eg. at petrol stations]

But, this is a good idea:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 75,00.html

J.R. wrote:Whilst I believe in 'Freedom of Movement' generally, I feel there must be some form of control over certain people who should be 'watched' very closely.

Does this answer your question ??

Woops! JR. Ready for another disagreement? This really smacks of BB

DavebytheSea wrote:

J.R. wrote:Whilst I believe in 'Freedom of Movement' generally, I feel there must be some form of control over certain people who should be 'watched' very closely.

Does this answer your question ??

Woops! JR. Ready for another disagreement? This really smacks of BB

.............. Not when we see members of a certain religious persuasion turning up at demonstrations, all wired up with 'imitation' bomb equipment.

He should thank his lucky stars, (or crescents), he wasn't shot on sight !

J.R. wrote:

DavebytheSea wrote:

J.R. wrote:Whilst I believe in 'Freedom of Movement' generally, I feel there must be some form of control over certain people who should be 'watched' very closely.

Does this answer your question ??

Woops! JR. Ready for another disagreement? This really smacks of BB

.............. Not when we see members of a certain religious persuasion turning up at demonstrations, all wired up with 'imitation' bomb equipment.

He should thank his lucky stars, (or crescents), he wasn't shot on sight !

Hear Hear !!

With Civil Libs, there's rarely an easy answer.

consider this though: if the guy with imitation bombs strapped to him really was considered a threat, he would have been shot dead there and then.
the fact that he wasn't, means that he wasn't.
which makes it a bit rich to then go on and use him as an excuse for Orwellian levels of control.

the guy was, undoubtedly, a bit of a w€nker. this speaks for itself, i really doubt he has many friends now (if he did before)