englishangel wrote:LOLOL.
Sorry, Susannah was early 19th century, not that I don't know my 18th from my 19th but I thought Susannah was about 1780.
I hope that my reference date - 1826-1832 - is correct. I am quoting from HTR. I wonder if I can verify this. There might be a date on one of the two portraits.
What I don't know is
LOLOL!!
Yes Mary Mc, I admit to being fascinated by the history of lingerie. There's a wonderful painting of a Parisian belle, c1881-1885; The Reception by James Tissot - she's wearing her corset on top of her dress! Rather in advance of Madonna!
Caroline - yes, how I agree! Or even if a couple of sisters would be dressed the same when out with their mother!
I felt very surprised that DR should state (rather casually?) in HTR that she "thought of founding a society for the abolition of one-child families".
Did she not think of the parents who are able to conceive only one child? Or those who have restricted their family to the baby they can afford? I could go on...
But I do feel this shows her as out of touch. She could only see the "give and take" of a larger family, as in a boarding school situation.
Love
Munch
Hey! Back on topic!